An ill-natured man Boswell certainly was not.Yet the malignity of the most malignant satirist could scarcely cut deeper than his thoughtless loquacity.Having himself no sensibility to derision and contempt, he took it for granted that all others were equally callous.He was not ashamed to exhibit himself to the whole world as a common spy, a common tattler, a humble companion without the excuse of poverty, and to tell a hundred stories of his own pertness and folly, and of the insults which his pertness and folly brought upon him.It was natural that he should show little discretion in cases in which the feelings or the honour of others might be concerned.No man, surely, ever published such stories respecting persons whom he professed to love and revere.He would infallibly have made his hero as contemptible as he has made himself, had not his hero really possessed some moral and intellectual qualities of a very high order.The best proof that Johnson was really an extraordinary man is that his character, instead of being degraded, has, on the whole, been decidedly raised by a work in which all his vices and weaknesses are exposed more unsparingly than they ever were exposed by Churchill or by Kenrick.
Johnson grown old, Johnson in the fulness of his fame and in the enjoyment of a competent fortune, is better known to us than any other man in history.Everything about him, his coat, his wig, his figure, his face, his scrofula, his St.Vitus's dance, his rolling walk, his blinking eye, the outward signs which too clearly marked his approbation of his dinner, his insatiable appetite for fish-sauce and veal-pie with plums, his inextinguishable thirst for tea, his trick of touching the posts as he walked, his mysterious practice of treasuring up scraps of orange-peel, his morning slumbers, his midnight disputations, his contortions, his mutterings, his gruntings, his puffings, his vigorous, acute, and ready eloquence, his sarcastic wit, his vehemence, his insolence, his fits of tempestuous rage, his queer inmates, old Mr.Levett and blind Mrs.Williams, the cat Hodge and the negro Frank, all are as familiar to us as the objects by which we have been surrounded from childhood.
But we have no minute information respecting those years of Johnson's life during which his character and his manners became immutably fixed.We know him, not as he was known to the men of his own generation, but as he was known to men whose father he might have been.That celebrated club of which he was the most distinguished member contained few persons who could remember a time when his fame was not fully established and his habits completely formed.He had made himself a name in literature while Reynolds and the Wartons were still boys.He was about twenty years older than Burke, Goldsmith, and Gerard Hamilton, about thirty years older than Gibbon, Beauclerk, and Langton, and about forty years older than Lord Stowell, Sir William Jones, and Windham.Boswell and Mrs.Thrale, the two writers from whom we derive most of our knowledge respecting him, never saw him till long after he was fifty years old, till most of his great works had become classical, and till the pension bestowed on him by the Crown had placed him above poverty.Of those eminent men who were his most intimate associates towards the close of his life, the only one, as far as we remember, who knew him during the first ten or twelve years of his residence in the capital, was David Garrick; and it does not appear that, during those years, David Garrick saw much of his fellow-townsman.
Johnson came up to London precisely at the time when the condition of a man of letters was most miserable and degraded.It was a dark night between two sunny days.The age of patronage had passed away.The age of general curiosity and intelligence had not arrived.The number of readers is at present so great that a popular author may subsist in comfort and opulence on the profits of his works.In the reigns of William the Third, of Anne, and of George the First, even such men as Congreve and Addison would scarcely have been able to live like gentlemen by the mere sale of their writings.But the deficiency of the natural demand for literature was, at the close of the seventeenth and at the beginning of the eighteenth century, more than made up by artificial encouragement, by a vast system of bounties and premiums.There was, perhaps, never a time at which the rewards of literary merit were so splendid, at which men who could write well found such easy admittance into the most distinguished society, and to the highest honours of the State.The chiefs of both the great parties into which the kingdom was divided, patronised literature with emulous munificence.Congreve, when he had scarcely attained his majority, was rewarded for his first comedy with places which made him independent for life.Smith, though his Hippolytus and Phaedra failed, would have been consoled with three hundred a year but for his own folly.Rowe was not only Poet Laureate, but also land-surveyor of the customs in the port of London, clerk of the council to the Prince of Wales, and secretary of the Presentations to the Lord Chancellor.
