The whole man seems to be an enigma, a grotesque assemblage of incongruous qualities, selfishness and generosity, cruelty and benevolence, craft and simplicity, abject villainy and romantic heroism.One sentence is such as a veteran diplomatist would scarcely write in cipher for the direction of his most confidential spy; the next seems to be extracted from a theme composed by an ardent schoolboy on the death of Leonidas.An act of dexterous perfidy, and an act of patriotic self-devotion, call forth the same kind and the same degree of respectful admiration.
The moral sensibility of the writer seems at once to be morbidly obtuse and morbidly acute.Two characters altogether dissimilar are united in him.They are not merely joined, but interwoven.
They are the warp and the woof of his mind; and their combination, like that of the variegated threads in shot silk, gives to the whole texture a glancing and ever-changing appearance.The explanation might have been easy, if he had been a very weak or a very affected man.But he was evidently neither the one nor the other.His works prove, beyond all contradiction, that his understanding was strong, his taste pure, and his sense of the ridiculous exquisitely keen.
This is strange: and yet the strangest is behind.There is no reason whatever to think, that those amongst whom he lived saw anything shocking or incongruous in his writings.Abundant proofs remain of the high estimation in which both his works and his person were held by the most respectable among his contemporaries.Clement the Seventh patronised the publication of those very books which the Council of Trent, in the following generation, pronounced unfit for the perusal of Christians.Some members of the democratical party censured the Secretary for dedicating The Prince to a patron who bore the unpopular name of Medici.But to those immoral doctrines which have since called forth such severe reprehensions no exception appears to have been taken.The cry against them was first raised beyond the Alps, and seems to have been heard with amazement in Italy.The earliest assailant, as far as we are aware, was a countryman of our own, Cardinal Pole.The author of the Anti-Machiavelli was a French Protestant.
It is, therefore, in the state of moral feeling among the Italians of those times that we must seek for the real explanation of what seems most mysterious in the life and writings of this remarkable man.As this is a subject which suggests many interesting considerations, both political and metaphysical, we shall make no apology for discussing it at some length.
During the gloomy and disastrous centuries which followed the downfall of the Roman Empire, Italy had preserved, in a far greater degree than any other part of Western Europe, the traces of ancient civilisation.The night which descended upon her was the night of an Arctic summer.The dawn began to reappear before the last reflection of the preceding sunset had faded from the horizon.It was in the time of the French Merovingians and of the Saxon Heptarchy that ignorance and ferocity seemed to have done their worst.Yet even then the Neapolitan provinces, recognising the authority of the Eastern Empire, preserved something of Eastern knowledge and refinement.Rome, protected by the sacred character of her Pontiffs, enjoyed at least comparative security and repose, Even in those regions where the sanguinary Lombards had fixed their monarchy, there was incomparably more of wealth, of information, of physical comfort, and of social order, than could be found in Gaul, Britain, or Germany.
That which most distinguished Italy from the neighbouring countries was the importance which the population of the towns, at a very early period, began to acquire.Some cities had been founded in wild and remote situations, by fugitives who had escaped from the rage of the barbarians.Such were Venice and Genoa, which preserved their freedom by their obscurity, till they became able to preserve it by their power.Other cities seem to have retained, under all the changing dynasties of invaders, under Odoacer and Theodoric, Narses and Alboin, the municipal institutions which had been conferred on them by the liberal policy of the Great Republic.In provinces which the central government was too feeble either to protect or to oppress, these institutions gradually acquired stability and vigour.The citizens, defended by their walls, and governed by their own magistrates and their own by-laws, enjoyed a considerable share of republican independence.Thus a strong democratic spirit was called into action.The Carlovingian sovereigns were too imbecile to subdue it.The generous policy of Otho encouraged it.It might perhaps have been suppressed by a close coalition between the Church and the Empire.It was fostered and invigorated by their disputes.In the twelfth century it attained its full vigour, and, after a long and doubtful conflict, triumphed over the abilities and courage of the Swabian princes.
The assistance of the Ecclesiastical power had greatly contributed to the success of the Guelfs.That success would, however, have been a doubtful good, if its only effect had been to substitute a moral for a political servitude, and to exalt the Popes at the expense of the Caesars.Happily the public mind of Italy had long contained the seeds of free opinions, which were now rapidly developed by the genial influence of free institutions.The people of that country had observed the whole machinery of the Church, its saints and its miracles, its lofty pretensions and its splendid ceremonial, its worthless blessings and its harmless curses, too long and too closely to be duped.
