The geographical frontier between the two religions has continued to run almost precisely where it ran at the close of the Thirty Years' War; nor has Protestantism given any proofs of that "expansive power" which has been ascribed to it.But the Protestant boasts, and boasts most justly, that wealth, civilisation, and intelligence, have increased far more on the northern than on the southern side of the boundary, and that countries so little favoured by nature as Scotland and Prussia are now among the most flourishing and best governed portions of the world, while the marble palaces of Genoa are deserted, while banditti infest the beautiful shores of Campania, while the fertile sea-coast of the Pontifical State is abandoned to buffaloes and wild boars.It cannot be doubted that, since the sixteenth century, the Protestant nations have made decidedly greater progress than their neighbours.The progress made by those nations in which Protestantism, though not finally successful, yet maintained a long struggle, and left permanent traces, has generally been considerable.But when we come to the Catholic Land, to the part of Europe in which the first spark of reformation was trodden out as soon as it appeared, and from which proceeded the impulse which drove Protestantism back, we find, at best, a very slow progress, and on the whole a retrogression.Compare Denmark and Portugal.When Luther began to preach, the superiority of the Portuguese was unquestionable.At present, the superiority of the Danes is no less so.Compare Edinburgh and Florence.Edinburgh has owed less to climate, to soil, and to the fostering care of rulers than any capital, Protestant or Catholic.In all these respects, Florence has been singularly happy.Yet whoever knows what Florence and Edinburgh were in the generation preceding the Reformation, and what they are now, will acknowledge that some great cause has, during the last three Centuries, operated to raise one part of the European family, and to depress the other.Compare the history of England and that of Spain during the last century.In arms, arts, sciences, letters, commerce, agriculture, the contrast is most striking.The distinction is not confined to this side of the Atlantic.The colonies planted by England in America have immeasurably outgrown in power those planted by Spain.Yet we have no reason to believe that, at the beginning of the sixteenth century, the Castilian was in any respect inferior to the Englishman.Our firm belief is, that the North owes its great civilisation and prosperity chiefly to the moral effect of the Protestant Reformation, and that the decay of the southern countries of Europe is to be mainly ascribed to the great Catholic revival.
About a hundred years after the final settlement of the boundary line between Protestantism and Catholicism, began to appear the signs of the fourth great peril of the Church of Rome.The storm which was now rising against her was of a very different kind from those which had preceded it.Those who had formerly attacked her had questioned only a part of her doctrines.A school was now growing up which rejected the whole.The Albigenses, the Lollards, the Lutherans, the Calvinists, had a positive religious system, and were strongly attached to it.The creed of the new sectaries was altogether negative.They took one of their premises from the Protestants, and one from the Catholics.From the latter they borrowed the principle, that Catholicism was the only pure and genuine Christianity.With the former, they held that some parts of the Catholic system were contrary to reason.
The conclusion was obvious.Two propositions, each of which separately is compatible with the most exalted piety, formed, when held in conjunction, the ground-work of a system of irreligion.The doctrine of Bossuet, that transubstantiation is affirmed in the Gospel, and the doctrine of Tillotson, that transubstantiation is an absurdity, when put together, produced by logical necessity, the inferences of Voltaire.
Had the sect which was rising at Paris been a sect of mere scoffers, it is very improbable that it would have left deep traces of its existence in the institutions and manners of Europe.Mere negation, mere Epicurean infidelity, as Lord Bacon most justly observes, has never disturbed the peace of the world.
It furnishes no motive for action.It inspires no enthusiasm.It has no missionaries, no crusaders, no martyrs.If the Patriarch of the Holy Philosophical Church had contented himself with making jokes about Saul's asses and David's wives, and with criticising the poetry of Ezekiel in the same narrow spirit in which he criticised that of Shakspeare, Rome would have had little to fear.But it is due to him and to his compeers to say that the real secret of their strength lay in the truth which was mingled with their errors, and in the generous enthusiasm which was hidden under their flippancy.They were men who, with all their faults, moral and intellectual, sincerely and earnestly desired the improvement of the condition of the human race, whose blood boiled at the sight of cruelty and injustice, who made manful war, with every faculty which they possessed, on what they considered as abuses, and who on many signal occasions placed themselves gallantly between the powerful and the oppressed.
While they assailed Christianity with a rancour and an unfairness disgraceful to men who called themselves philosophers, they yet had, in far greater measure than their opponents, that charity towards men of all classes and races which Christianity enjoins.
