登陆注册
5419400000150

第150章

The cosmological principle of totality could not give us any certain knowledge in regard to the maximum in the series of conditions in the world of sense, considered as a thing in itself.The actual regress in the series is the only means of approaching this maximum.

This principle of pure reason, therefore, may still be considered as valid- not as an axiom enabling us to cogitate totality in the object as actual, but as a problem for the understanding, which requires it to institute and to continue, in conformity with the idea of totality in the mind, the regress in the series of the conditions of a given conditioned.For in the world of sense, that is, in space and time, every condition which we discover in our investigation of phenomena is itself conditioned; because sensuous objects are not things in themselves (in which case an absolutely unconditioned might be reached in the progress of cognition), but are merely empirical representations the conditions of which must always be found in intuition.The principle of reason is therefore properly a mere rule- prescribing a regress in the series of conditions for given phenomena, and prohibiting any pause or rest on an absolutely unconditioned.It is, therefore, not a principle of the possibility of experience or of the empirical cognition of sensuous objects- consequently not a principle of the understanding;for every experience is confined within certain proper limits determined by the given intuition.Still less is it a constitutive principle of reason authorizing us to extend our conception of the sensuous world beyond all possible experience.It is merely a principle for the enlargement and extension of experience as far as is possible for human faculties.It forbids us to consider any empirical limits as absolute.It is, hence, a principle of reason, which, as a rule, dictates how we ought to proceed in our empirical regress, but is unable to anticipate or indicate prior to the empirical regress what is given in the object itself.I have termed it for this reason a regulative principle of reason; while the principle of the absolute totality of the series of conditions, as existing in itself and given in the object, is a constitutive cosmological principle.This distinction will at once demonstrate the falsehood of the constitutive principle, and prevent us from attributing (by a transcendental subreptio) objective reality to an idea, which is valid only as a rule.

In order to understand the proper meaning of this rule of pure reason, we must notice first that it cannot tell us what the object is, but only how the empirical regress is to be proceeded with in order to attain to the complete conception of the object.If it gave us any information in respect to the former statement, it would be a constitutive principle- a principle impossible from the nature of pure reason.It will not therefore enable us to establish any such conclusions as: "The series of conditions for a given conditioned is in itself finite." or, "It is infinite." For, in this case, we should be cogitating in the mere idea of absolute totality, an object which is not and cannot be given in experience; inasmuch as we should be attributing a reality objective and independent of the empirical synthesis, to a series of phenomena.This idea of reason cannot then be regarded as valid- except as a rule for the regressive synthesis in the series of conditions, according to which we must proceed from the conditioned, through all intermediate and subordinate conditions, up to the unconditioned; although this goal is unattained and unattainable.For the absolutely unconditioned cannot be discovered in the sphere of experience.

We now proceed to determine clearly our notion of a synthesis which can never be complete.There are two terms commonly employed for this purpose.These terms are regarded as expressions of different and distinguishable notions, although the ground of the distinction has never been clearly exposed.The term employed by the mathematicians is progressus in infinitum.The philosophers prefer the expression progressus in indefinitum.Without detaining the reader with an examination of the reasons for such a distinction, or with remarks on the right or wrong use of the terms, I shall endeavour clearly to determine these conceptions, so far as is necessary for the purpose in this Critique.

We may, with propriety, say of a straight line, that it may be produced to infinity.In this case the distinction between a progressus in infinitum and a progressus in indefinitum is a mere piece of subtlety.For, although when we say, "Produce a straight line," it is more correct to say in indefinitum than in infinitum;because the former means, "Produce it as far as you please," the second, "You must not cease to produce it"; the expression in infinitum is, when we are speaking of the power to do it, perfectly correct, for we can always make it longer if we please- on to infinity.And this remark holds good in all cases, when we speak of a progressus, that is, an advancement from the condition to the conditioned; this possible advancement always proceeds to infinity.We may proceed from a given pair in the descending line of generation from father to son, and cogitate a never-ending line of descendants from it.For in such a case reason does not demand absolute totality in the series, because it does not presuppose it as a condition and as given (datum), but merely as conditioned, and as capable of being given (dabile).

同类推荐
  • 感时上卢相

    感时上卢相

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • The Colour of Life

    The Colour of Life

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 周易正义

    周易正义

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • Boy Scouts in Mexico

    Boy Scouts in Mexico

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 金刚经受持感应录

    金刚经受持感应录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
热门推荐
  • 御剑天涯

    御剑天涯

    山村少年吴逸,无意中得到上古至宝剑灵,从此踏上修仙之路,报血仇,伐妖族,倚剑携美逍遥天涯。
  • 天论

    天论

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 太清金液神气经

    太清金液神气经

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 计算机:一部历史

    计算机:一部历史

    《计算机:一部历史》,给大众读者写的计算机科普读物,零门槛入门计算机科学。讲述计算机背后鲜为人知的故事,普及关于计算机和互联网,你不得不了解的知识。在过去数十年里,除非你一直与世隔绝,否则就不可能不受到信息革命的影响。我们身处技术演进史上的计算机时代,无论你是计算机和互联网的拥护者、反对者还是旁观者,无论你是否具备计算机专业背景,只要你使用计算机,这本书就是你的案头必备。
  • 布莱塔妮娅帝国的崛起

    布莱塔妮娅帝国的崛起

    来自地球的灵魂来到魔法世界不仅继承了父亲的帝国,也继承了母亲的遗产,随后……入侵其他世界……(异世界综漫+部分人物乱入)
  • 海贼之远程法师

    海贼之远程法师

    何为法师?何为修仙?何为海贼?呼风唤雨,招雷引电,掌控规则,这算是基本操作。书中没有你们想象的所有,只有一些简单的叙述。把主角当做法师没错,当做修仙者也没错,只不过是最强与最弱之分,若是非要挑剔,那随意,请自便。此书只是为当初一段海贼追忆,以及其他...适众:静心者
  • 天意:中国科幻银河奖特别奖作品

    天意:中国科幻银河奖特别奖作品

    中国科幻银河奖特别奖作品!改编成历史科幻剧《天意之秦天宝鉴》,由欧豪、海铃、乔振宇、张丹峰主演,已于2017年8月杀青。本土历史科幻神作《天意》最完美修订版!半人半蛇的伏羲,大禹铸造的九鼎,长生不老的彭祖……数千年人口繁衍和智慧开启背后,竟然是极其可怕的阴谋。故事,就从贫贱潦倒的韩信被“神”选中开始。
  • 超级小前锋

    超级小前锋

    新书《篮坛大流氓》已发,人品保证,求收藏~
  • 健康是吃出来的

    健康是吃出来的

    一本以中国传统文化为指导思想的健康著作,一本以健康膳食为基本内容的实用操作手册!《健康是吃出来的》根据二十四节气的变化,精选数百种健康膳食,从饮食观念、营养知识、膳食结构、饮食搭配等方面入手,使读者不仅能够获得健康膳食的文化理念,更可以按照书中所提供的粥谱、菜谱、汤谱自己烹饪出一道道美味佳肴,吃出一生好健康。
  • 佛说圣观自在菩萨梵赞

    佛说圣观自在菩萨梵赞

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。