登陆注册
5419400000222

第222章

The first rule for our guidance is, therefore, not to attempt a transcendental proof, before we have considered from what source we are to derive the principles upon which the proof is to be based, and what right we have to expect that our conclusions from these principles will be veracious.If they are principles of the understanding, it is vain to expect that we should attain by their means to ideas of pure reason; for these principles are valid only in regard to objects of possible experience.If they are principles of pure reason, our labour is alike in vain.For the principles of reason, if employed as objective, are without exception dialectical and possess no validity or truth, except as regulative principles of the systematic employment of reason in experience.But when such delusive proof are presented to us, it is our duty to meet them with the non liquet of a matured judgement; and, although we are unable to expose the particular sophism upon which the proof is based, we have a right to demand a deduction of the principles employed in it;and, if these principles have their origin in pure reason alone, such a deduction is absolutely impossible.And thus it is unnecessary that we should trouble ourselves with the exposure and confutation of every sophistical illusion; we may, at once, bring all dialectic, which is inexhaustible in the production of fallacies, before the bar of critical reason, which tests the principles upon which all dialectical procedure is based.The second peculiarity of transcendental proof is that a transcendental proposition cannot rest upon more than a single proof.If I am drawing conclusions, not from conceptions, but from intuition corresponding to a conception, be it pure intuition, as in mathematics, or empirical, as in natural science, the intuition which forms the basis of my inferences presents me with materials for many synthetical propositions, which I can connect in various modes, while, as it is allowable to proceed from different points in the intention, I can arrive by different paths at the same proposition.

But every transcendental proposition sets out from a conception, and posits the synthetical condition of the possibility of an object according to this conception.There must, therefore, be but one ground of proof, because it is the conception alone which determines the object; and thus the proof cannot contain anything more than the determination of the object according to the conception.In our Transcendental Analytic, for example, we inferred the principle: Every event has a cause, from the only condition of the objective possibility of our conception of an event.This is that an event cannot be determined in time, and consequently cannot form a part of experience, unless it stands under this dynamical law.This is the only possible ground of proof; for our conception of an event possesses objective validity, that is, is a true conception, only because the law of causality determines an object to which it can refer.Other arguments in support of this principle have been attempted- such as that from the contingent nature of a phenomenon;but when this argument is considered, we can discover no criterion of contingency, except the fact of an event- of something happening, that is to say, the existence which is preceded by the non-existence of an object, and thus we fall back on the very thing to be proved.If the proposition: "Every thinking being is simple," is to be proved, we keep to the conception of the ego, which is simple, and to which all thought has a relation.The same is the case with the transcendental proof of the existence of a Deity, which is based solely upon the harmony and reciprocal fitness of the conceptions of an ens realissimum and a necessary being, and cannot be attempted in any other manner.

This caution serves to simplify very much the criticism of all propositions of reason.When reason employs conceptions alone, only one proof of its thesis is possible, if any.When, therefore, the dogmatist advances with ten arguments in favour of a proposition, we may be sure that not one of them is conclusive.For if he possessed one which proved the proposition he brings forward to demonstration-as must always be the case with the propositions of pure reason-what need is there for any more? His intention can only be similar to that of the advocate who had different arguments for different judges; this availing himself of the weakness of those who examine his arguments, who, without going into any profound investigation, adopt the view of the case which seems most probable at first sight and decide according to it.

The third rule for the guidance of pure reason in the conduct of a proof is that all transcendental proofs must never be apagogic or indirect, but always ostensive or direct.The direct or ostensive proof not only establishes the truth of the proposition to be proved, but exposes the grounds of its truth; the apagogic, on the other hand, may assure us of the truth of the proposition, but it cannot enable us to comprehend the grounds of its possibility.The latter is, accordingly, rather an auxiliary to an argument, than a strictly philosophical and rational mode of procedure.In one respect, however, they have an advantage over direct proofs, from the fact that the mode of arguing by contradiction, which they employ, renders our understanding of the question more clear, and approximates the proof to the certainty of an intuitional demonstration.

同类推荐
  • 易象图说内篇

    易象图说内篇

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 雪压轩词

    雪压轩词

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 法玺印禅师语录

    法玺印禅师语录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 六祖坛经

    六祖坛经

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 橐钥子

    橐钥子

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
热门推荐
  • 红楼之爱我仙姝

    红楼之爱我仙姝

    有美人兮,见之不忘,一日不见兮,思之如狂。羡美人之良质兮,阆苑仙葩,慕美人之品格兮,幽兰傲竹。回眸顾盼兮,宜嗔宜喜,巧言倩笑兮,若飞若扬。愿舍所有,常伴左右!红楼十二钗最喜林妹妹。此文,接原著八十回后继写,只想写一个不用还泪的黛玉,快乐的黛玉!欢迎光临红楼情思论坛:[url]http://wkkk.net[/url]内有多名会员原创红楼小说和分析研究的文章,欢迎前来参与讨论。近期有很多朋友加入,请多参与论坛活动,太虚幻境模块圆大家红楼之梦!欢迎加入红楼情思二群:51526086特别推荐好友恋爱成冰的最新力作:《偷生一个宝宝》
  • 边婚边爱:老公,正经点

    边婚边爱:老公,正经点

    他是翩翩公子,豪门继承人,她不过是个无依孤女,人人都说她能嫁给他是走了狗屎运,可她却给了他一个惊喜。盛大的婚礼上,新娘逃婚不知所踪,新郎成了笑柄!所有人都跳出来咒骂她的时候,他搂着她的肩高调宣布:“谁敢侮辱我的妻子,我就让他消失。”她一心想逃,他不惜一切手段,只为将她留在他身边。“白初,你要你叔叔安然无恙,来求我啊。”“你为什么逃婚?不愿嫁我?可你这辈子都只能是我的女人。”--情节虚构,请勿模仿
  • 从长城开始的次元远征

    从长城开始的次元远征

    穿越到宋朝成为了一名八十多岁的老怪物,身为无影禁军的殿帅看赵公明如何用山海异兽、武功心法、绝世神兵武装自己的军团,多年之后赵公明微笑着看着跟随自己征战万界的无影禁军…………看我们的主角赵公明如何用坑爹的召唤系统打造出一只属于自己的无影禁军。萌新勿喷…………
  • 1627崛起南海

    1627崛起南海

    担心穿越之后势单力孤难以实现雄心壮志?梦想回到古时称霸一方却无机会大展拳脚?为了英雄霸业,为了三妻四妾,怀着不同心思的各路人马聚集到一起,义无反顾地踏入另一个时空!VIP读者群378375510
  • 做个对自己负责的人(保持学生良好心态的故事全集)

    做个对自己负责的人(保持学生良好心态的故事全集)

    走进如歌的生命,走过诗意的青春。曾几何时,我们叹息时光的飞逝,叹惋落日的凄美,却任凭美好从身边转瞬即逝。不是青春短暂、岁月苍白,而是我们不曾将它涂上丰富的色彩。何不于喧闹中体会宁静,于繁杂中感受简约,以平静的心情看待得失,以良好的心态面对功利,“不以物喜,不以己悲”才是人生之大境界。
  • 青葱岁月之暖爱

    青葱岁月之暖爱

    你是我生命中的永恒之痕——许慕宸那一年,她情窦初开;那一年,他年少轻狂;那一年,他们相遇……她爱的张扬而又自卑,他爱的内敛而又热烈。他们的相遇是缘分的降临,还是命运的擦肩而过……花开的季节,爱的种子已悄然种下……
  • 腹黑三小姐:特工狂妃

    腹黑三小姐:特工狂妃

    她,黑道界令人闻风丧胆的特工之王,被炸成残肢断骸。——她,轻纱白鹭,轻纱帝国闻名遐迩的废物三小姐,轻纱家耻辱,死于非命。一朝穿越,惊华艳艳,艳绝天下。是凤,当破九霄,岂敢苟活于世?。巾帼不让须眉,须眉都给我趴着,看她如何威震天下!——爱盛盛,喝肾宝,生活无限好~
  • 绝地追杀

    绝地追杀

    朋友:你知道绝地求生吗?这游戏可好玩了。孙尧圣:哦?那我们玩的可能不是同一款游戏。朋友:你玩的是什么?孙尧圣:我玩的这款游戏,叫绝地追杀。朋友:我怎么没听过这款游戏?孙尧圣:只要见过我玩的人,都知道。因为……我只追杀,不求生!杀完,可不就活下来了吗?绝地求生还是绝地追杀,仅在一念之间罢了。
  • 闽海纪要

    闽海纪要

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 一条忍着不死的鱼(动物传奇·神秘卷)

    一条忍着不死的鱼(动物传奇·神秘卷)

    动物与人类一样经历“生老病死”、“婚丧嫁娶”,动物们也性梠各异:鹰冷酷、蛇毒辣、狮子霸道……它们的存在使大自然充满生机和活力,也使人类的生活更加丰富和充实。此套10本“动物传奇”丛书以短小的篇幅、精练的语言,描绘出大自然是善良的慈母,同时也是冷酷的屠夫,人类只有顺应大自然,而不是战胜大自然,才会与大自然和谐地融为一体。