登陆注册
5419400000223

第223章

The true reason why indirect proofs are employed in different sciences is this.When the grounds upon which we seek to base a cognition are too various or too profound, we try whether or not we may not discover the truth of our cognition from its consequences.The modus ponens of reasoning from the truth of its inferences to the truth of a proposition would be admissible if all the inferences that can be drawn from it are known to be true; for in this case there can be only one possible ground for these inferences, and that is the true one.But this is a quite impracticable procedure, as it surpasses all our powers to discover all the possible inferences that can be drawn from a proposition.But this mode of reasoning is employed, under favour, when we wish to prove the truth of an hypothesis; in which case we admit the truth of the conclusion-which is supported by analogy- that, if all the inferences we have drawn and examined agree with the proposition assumed, all other possible inferences will also agree with it.But, in this way, an hypothesis can never be established as a demonstrated truth.The modus tollens of reasoning from known inferences to the unknown proposition, is not only a rigorous, but a very easy mode of proof.For, if it can be shown that but one inference from a proposition is false, then the proposition must itself be false.Instead, then, of examining, in an ostensive argument, the whole series of the grounds on which the truth of a proposition rests, we need only take the opposite of this proposition, and if one inference from it be false, then must the opposite be itself false; and, consequently, the proposition which we wished to prove must be true.

The apagogic method of proof is admissible only in those sciences where it is impossible to mistake a subjective representation for an objective cognition.Where this is possible, it is plain that the opposite of a given proposition may contradict merely the subjective conditions of thought, and not the objective cognition; or it may happen that both propositions contradict each other only under a subjective condition, which is incorrectly considered to be objective, and, as the condition is itself false, both propositions may be false, and it will, consequently, be impossible to conclude the truth of the one from the falseness of the other.

In mathematics such subreptions are impossible; and it is in this science, accordingly, that the indirect mode of proof has its true place.In the science of nature, where all assertion is based upon empirical intuition, such subreptions may be guarded against by the repeated comparison of observations; but this mode of proof is of little value in this sphere of knowledge.But the transcendental efforts of pure reason are all made in the sphere of the subjective, which is the real medium of all dialectical illusion; and thus reason endeavours, in its premisses, to impose upon us subjective representations for objective cognitions.In the transcendental sphere of pure reason, then, and in the case of synthetical propositions, it is inadmissible to support a statement by disproving the counter-statement.For only two cases are possible; either, the counter-statement is nothing but the enouncement of the inconsistency of the opposite opinion with the subjective conditions of reason, which does not affect the real case (for example, we cannot comprehend the unconditioned necessity of the existence of a being, and hence every speculative proof of the existence of such a being must be opposed on subjective grounds, while the possibility of this being in itself cannot with justice be denied); or, both propositions, being dialectical in their nature, are based upon an impossible conception.In this latter case the rule applies: non entis nulla sunt predicata; that is to say, what we affirm and what we deny, respecting such an object, are equally untrue, and the apagogic mode of arriving at the truth is in this case impossible.If, for example, we presuppose that the world of sense is given in itself in its totality, it is false, either that it is infinite, or that it is finite and limited in space.Both are false, because the hypothesis is false.For the notion of phenomena (as mere representations) which are given in themselves (as objects) is self-contradictory; and the infinitude of this imaginary whole would, indeed, be unconditioned, but would be inconsistent (as everything in the phenomenal world is conditioned) with the unconditioned determination and finitude of quantities which is presupposed in our conception.

The apagogic mode of proof is the true source of those illusions which have always had so strong an attraction for the admirers of dogmatical philosophy.It may be compared to a champion who maintains the honour and claims of the party he has adopted by offering battle to all who doubt the validity of these claims and the purity of that honour; while nothing can be proved in this way, except the respective strength of the combatants, and the advantage, in this respect, is always on the side of the attacking party.

Spectators, observing that each party is alternately conqueror and conquered, are led to regard the subject of dispute as beyond the power of man to decide upon.But such an opinion cannot be justified; and it is sufficient to apply to these reasoners the remark:

Non defensoribus istis Tempus eget.

同类推荐
  • 北帝伏魔经法建坛仪

    北帝伏魔经法建坛仪

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 词林正韵

    词林正韵

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 文殊师利菩萨无相十礼

    文殊师利菩萨无相十礼

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 明伦汇编皇极典君道部

    明伦汇编皇极典君道部

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 佛说大辩邪正经

    佛说大辩邪正经

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
热门推荐
  • 佛养心,道养性:佛心慧语悟人生

    佛养心,道养性:佛心慧语悟人生

    本书系佛教人生哲学通俗读物。通过一个个教人向善、安抚心灵、启迪智慧的佛家小故事,阐述了诸多为人处世的人生哲理,展现了佛学的博大精深。
  • 女扮男装之冷情帝相

    女扮男装之冷情帝相

    穿越前“老师,我喜欢你”“啊?”穿越后“老师哥哥本王好像断袖了,你得负责。”“什么”穿越前她身为女子被女人表白。穿越后,她为省去麻烦,决定女扮男装,一生默默无闻可惜有一个好胜的父亲,无奈只能稍稍发挥一下,准备考个青衣,可谁知一考就考上了宰相。哎,无奈之下只能申请去给皇子公主授课。可穿越成了悲剧,再度上演,她……(极度宠文,咱是亲妈,不虐女主)
  • 穿越之医仙神妃

    穿越之医仙神妃

    女主角慕琳儿因为十年没见的爷爷被绑架,她答应绑匪刘老去异世拿到刘老家里的老祖宗所说的长寿石。穿越到异世之后,成为了同名同姓的慕琳儿,多了一个哥哥,兄妹两人都是废材,被家族遗弃到了一个偏远的小村子……【情节虚构,请勿模仿】
  • 首届世界华语悬疑大赛优秀作品选集(陆)

    首届世界华语悬疑大赛优秀作品选集(陆)

    生活是人性的修罗场,故事则是在演绎修罗场里的悲欢情仇……而悬疑文学一直是用故事凝练的生活序章,本书收录首届世界华语悬疑文学大赛入围及获奖的中短篇作品精选集,包括科幻、恐怖、冒险、情感、历史等多类悬疑和泛悬疑题材,让你一次读过瘾!
  • 暗月无光

    暗月无光

    小琦刚把办公桌上的东西收拾好,大雨就哗哗地落下了。看一看时间,已是下午五点钟,幼儿园已到了放学的时间,于是小琦就撑了把伞走了出去。雨太大,那把天蓝色的小雨伞根本起不了多大的作用,才出单位的大门,小琦的全身已被雨水打透了。小琦抬头看看黑压压的天,叫了辆出租车。到了幼儿园的门口,还好,还没有放学。校门口已聚集了许多接孩子的家长,把门口堵得严严实实的,小琦就在不远处的一棵树下站了,等女儿出来。衣服全湿了,贴在身上,使小琦全身的曲线毕露。
  • 呼兰河传

    呼兰河传

    茅盾评价《呼兰河传》,是“一篇叙事诗,一幅多彩的风土画,一串凄婉的歌谣”。 呼兰河小城的生活或许有一点沉闷,萧红用绘画式的语言,“在灰暗的日常生活背景前,呈现了粗线条的、大红大绿的带有原始性的色彩”,勾勒出一幕幕充满童趣的影像。
  • 媚男有点坏

    媚男有点坏

    她,一个拥有聪慧过人的头脑,倾城倾国相貌的郡主,是什么让她一夕之间转变身份,仿若他人?她把爱视如草芥,却又为何至于失落而甘于沉沦?对待爱情,他们宁负天下不负卿,为爱执着一生等待一生。凡尘中,问世间情为何物?直教人生死相许。
  • 江湖有多大

    江湖有多大

    一个人的逝去,带走了一个江湖,仅以此书致前辈!
  • Some Roundabout Papers

    Some Roundabout Papers

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 天城轶事

    天城轶事

    浮空天城之上,三皇五帝齐聚小打小闹之间,三千年的恩恩怨怨渐渐浮现当最后的阴谋浮现,他追悔莫及却无能为力谁是最大的野心家,谁是命定的那个人神秘的封印,现在开启…