登陆注册
5451600000004

第4章

In the law of contract the use of moral phraseology led to equal confusion, as I have shown in part already, but only in part.Morals deal with the actual internal state of the individual's mind, what he actually intends.From the time of the Romans down to now, this mode of dealing has affected the language of the law as to contract, and the language used has reacted upon the thought.We talk about a contract as a meeting of the minds of the parties, and thence it is inferred in various cases that there is no contract because their minds have not met; that is, because they have intended different things or because one party has not known of the assent of the other.Yet nothing is more certain than that parties may be bound by a contract to things which neither of them intended, and when one does not know of the other's assent.Suppose a contract is executed in due form and in writing to deliver a lecture, mentioning no time.One of the parties thinks that the promise will be construed to mean at once, within a week.The other thinks that it means when he is ready.The court says that it means within a reasonable time.The parties are bound by the contract as it is interpreted by the court, yet neither of them meant what the court declares that they have said.In my opinion no one will understand the true theory of contract or be able even to discuss some fundamental questions intelligently until he has understood that all contracts are formal, that the making of a contract depends not on the agreement of two minds in one intention, but on the agreement of two sets of external signs--not on the parties' having meant the same thing but on their having said the same thing.Furthermore, as the signs may be addressed to one sense or another--to sight or to hearing--on the nature of the sign will depend the moment when the contract is made.If the sign is tangible, for instance, a letter, the contract is made when the letter of acceptance is delivered.If it is necessary that the minds of the parties meet, there will be no contract until the acceptance can be read; none, for example, if the acceptance be snatched from the hand of the offerer by a third person.

This is not the time to work out a theory in detail, or to answer many obvious doubts and questions which are suggested by these general views.

I know of none which are not easy to answer, but what I am trying to do now is only by a series of hints to throw some light on the narrow path of legal doctrine, and upon two pitfalls which, as it seems to me, lie perilously near to it.Of the first of these I have said enough.Ihope that my illustrations have shown the danger, both to speculation and to practice, of confounding morality with law, and the trap which legal language lays for us on that side of our way.For my own part, Ioften doubt whether it would not be a gain if every word of moral significance could be banished from the law altogether, and other words adopted which should convey legal ideas uncolored by anything outside the law.We should lose the fossil records of a good deal of history and the majesty got from ethical associations, but by ridding ourselves of an unnecessary confusion we should gain very much in the clearness of our thought.

So much for the limits of the law.The next thing which I wish to consider is what are the forces which determine its content and its growth.You may assume, with Hobbes and Bentham and Austin, that all law emanates from the sovereign, even when the first human beings to enunciate it are the judges, or you may think that law is the voice of the Zeitgeist, or what you like.It is all one to my present purpose.

Even if every decision required the sanction of an emperor with despotic power and a whimsical turn of mind, we should be interested none the less, still with a view to prediction, in discovering some order, some rational explanation, and some principle of growth for the rules which he laid down.In every system there are such explanations and principles to be found.It is with regard to them that a second fallacy comes in, which I think it important to expose.

The fallacy to which I refer is the notion that the only force at work in the development of the law is logic.In the broadest sense, indeed, that notion would be true.The postulate on which we think about the universe is that there is a fixed quantitative relation between every phenomenon and its antecedents and consequents.If there is such a thing as a phenomenon without these fixed quantitative relations, it is a miracle.It is outside the law of cause and effect, and as such transcends our power of thought, or at least is something to or from which we cannot reason.The condition of our thinking about the universe is that it is capable of being thought about rationally, or, in other words, that every part of it is effect and cause in the same sense in which those parts are with which we are most familiar.So in the broadest sense it is true that the law is a logical development, like everything else.The danger of which I speak is not the admission that the principles governing other phenomena also govern the law, but the notion that a given system, ours, for instance, can be worked out like mathematics from some general axioms of conduct.This is the natural error of the schools, but it is not confined to them.I once heard a very eminent judge say that he never let a decision go until he was absolutely sure that it was right.So judicial dissent often is blamed, as if it meant simply that one side or the other were not doing their sums right, and if they would take more trouble, agreement inevitably would come.

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 渠丘耳梦录

    渠丘耳梦录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 蹦哒吧!老汉

    蹦哒吧!老汉

    世态炎凉,人心难断设局的番子和托在窃窃私语劫犯在深夜的小巷中等待天有点冷,不见漫天繁星姑娘向路人抛着媚眼,而路人也在注视着她直到王小光站直了老腰路人才不得不尴尬地移开视线
  • 战道天图

    战道天图

    说起来你可能不信,我是被棺材撞死的!~~~~~~木雨如是说。一座不可思议的天棺,一门来历不明的功法,铸就一张旷古绝今的战图,尘封久远的秘辛,也如画卷般,慢慢展开......他一直以为自己是个废材,要上演一出逆袭的精彩,所以精谋细划、拼死拼活地抢资源、提资质、强实力;他一直以为自己是个矮穷矬,一心追求高质量的生活,奈何修炼是个无底洞,养自己太难!直到走出这个世界,他才发现原来自己错了,错得离谱,因为他不仅是个奇才,还是个高富帅......
  • 王者荣耀:人头归你,你归我

    王者荣耀:人头归你,你归我

    【2018王者荣耀文学大赛·征文参赛作品】【超甜刺激】小宅:“大神,昨晚梦到你了。”宁渊:“在梦里你对我做了什么?”
  • 王妃怪美的

    王妃怪美的

    千雪尔怀着一身怒火重活一世,扮着萌萌哒的乖兔子,其实就是只狡猾狐狸,与上一世的仇人斗智斗勇,生活是越过越顺利,不想遇到一匹看似佛性,内心却骚包的狼。
  • 辛巴达航海历险记(语文新课标课外必读第九辑)

    辛巴达航海历险记(语文新课标课外必读第九辑)

    国家教育部颁布了最新《语文课程标准》,统称新课标,对中、小学语文教学指定了阅读书目,对阅读的数量、内容、质量以及速度都提出了明确的要求,这对于提高学生的阅读能力,培养语文素养,陶冶情操,促进学生终身学习和终身可持续发展,对于提高广大人民的文学素养具有极大的意义。
  • 重生之妃常谋略

    重生之妃常谋略

    国破之日,她拱手江山予他,他允她皇后之位。却在登基之日,以妖女惑主,将她推入万蛇之窟,活活见她被咬死。一腔蓄怨,久聚不散,借尸还魂。重生,她用世间另一张脸,算尽机关,步步生逼,搅乱风雨。深宫中斗智斗勇,权谋里比狠比绝,这一世,她是一团火,烧也要烧到他身上去。世人皆道她红颜祸水,她却扶榻轻笑,至少,我是红颜。放荡不羁,热辣如火,用单薄身躯,抒写下一段慷慨悲壮之歌。且看一个女子如何,翻手为云覆手为雨,拂风云变幻。--情节虚构,请勿模仿
  • 供养护世八天法

    供养护世八天法

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 趣味经济学:把握经济脉动的绝佳教材

    趣味经济学:把握经济脉动的绝佳教材

    你想了解当下的经济动向吗?你想把握时代的经济脉动吗?跟随知名经济学教授或商界巨擘在趣味横生的案例中学习那些不可不知的经济学知识,将是怎样的一种体验呢?本书从供需、消费、厂家、财税等方面,采用趣味案例引出经济理论,以经济理论结合实际生活的模式,向读者介绍了不可不知的经济学知识及应用,帮助读者更清楚地认识各种经济现象,更准确地把握经济脉动,进而更合理地规划自己的经济生活。
  • 夜光青柠

    夜光青柠

    在这之前,沈泽齐真的和中途转学过来的崔夏天没有交集。仔细想想,对于崔夏天仅有的印象大概就是她的沉默寡言和那张扑克脸。除了转学过来的第一天在讲台上做了个简短到只有名字和来自哪个城市的自我介绍外,在平日的学习生活里她沉默得像是一个哑巴。平时,大家只有在上课她被点到回答问题的时候才能听到她的声音。另外,在班里发生什么事情大家或惊讶或大笑或愤怒的时候,她总是面无表情地在座位上正襟危坐,大有一副不食人间烟火的高冷样儿。