登陆注册
5451600000004

第4章

In the law of contract the use of moral phraseology led to equal confusion, as I have shown in part already, but only in part.Morals deal with the actual internal state of the individual's mind, what he actually intends.From the time of the Romans down to now, this mode of dealing has affected the language of the law as to contract, and the language used has reacted upon the thought.We talk about a contract as a meeting of the minds of the parties, and thence it is inferred in various cases that there is no contract because their minds have not met; that is, because they have intended different things or because one party has not known of the assent of the other.Yet nothing is more certain than that parties may be bound by a contract to things which neither of them intended, and when one does not know of the other's assent.Suppose a contract is executed in due form and in writing to deliver a lecture, mentioning no time.One of the parties thinks that the promise will be construed to mean at once, within a week.The other thinks that it means when he is ready.The court says that it means within a reasonable time.The parties are bound by the contract as it is interpreted by the court, yet neither of them meant what the court declares that they have said.In my opinion no one will understand the true theory of contract or be able even to discuss some fundamental questions intelligently until he has understood that all contracts are formal, that the making of a contract depends not on the agreement of two minds in one intention, but on the agreement of two sets of external signs--not on the parties' having meant the same thing but on their having said the same thing.Furthermore, as the signs may be addressed to one sense or another--to sight or to hearing--on the nature of the sign will depend the moment when the contract is made.If the sign is tangible, for instance, a letter, the contract is made when the letter of acceptance is delivered.If it is necessary that the minds of the parties meet, there will be no contract until the acceptance can be read; none, for example, if the acceptance be snatched from the hand of the offerer by a third person.

This is not the time to work out a theory in detail, or to answer many obvious doubts and questions which are suggested by these general views.

I know of none which are not easy to answer, but what I am trying to do now is only by a series of hints to throw some light on the narrow path of legal doctrine, and upon two pitfalls which, as it seems to me, lie perilously near to it.Of the first of these I have said enough.Ihope that my illustrations have shown the danger, both to speculation and to practice, of confounding morality with law, and the trap which legal language lays for us on that side of our way.For my own part, Ioften doubt whether it would not be a gain if every word of moral significance could be banished from the law altogether, and other words adopted which should convey legal ideas uncolored by anything outside the law.We should lose the fossil records of a good deal of history and the majesty got from ethical associations, but by ridding ourselves of an unnecessary confusion we should gain very much in the clearness of our thought.

So much for the limits of the law.The next thing which I wish to consider is what are the forces which determine its content and its growth.You may assume, with Hobbes and Bentham and Austin, that all law emanates from the sovereign, even when the first human beings to enunciate it are the judges, or you may think that law is the voice of the Zeitgeist, or what you like.It is all one to my present purpose.

Even if every decision required the sanction of an emperor with despotic power and a whimsical turn of mind, we should be interested none the less, still with a view to prediction, in discovering some order, some rational explanation, and some principle of growth for the rules which he laid down.In every system there are such explanations and principles to be found.It is with regard to them that a second fallacy comes in, which I think it important to expose.

The fallacy to which I refer is the notion that the only force at work in the development of the law is logic.In the broadest sense, indeed, that notion would be true.The postulate on which we think about the universe is that there is a fixed quantitative relation between every phenomenon and its antecedents and consequents.If there is such a thing as a phenomenon without these fixed quantitative relations, it is a miracle.It is outside the law of cause and effect, and as such transcends our power of thought, or at least is something to or from which we cannot reason.The condition of our thinking about the universe is that it is capable of being thought about rationally, or, in other words, that every part of it is effect and cause in the same sense in which those parts are with which we are most familiar.So in the broadest sense it is true that the law is a logical development, like everything else.The danger of which I speak is not the admission that the principles governing other phenomena also govern the law, but the notion that a given system, ours, for instance, can be worked out like mathematics from some general axioms of conduct.This is the natural error of the schools, but it is not confined to them.I once heard a very eminent judge say that he never let a decision go until he was absolutely sure that it was right.So judicial dissent often is blamed, as if it meant simply that one side or the other were not doing their sums right, and if they would take more trouble, agreement inevitably would come.

同类推荐
  • 佛母大金曜孔雀明王经

    佛母大金曜孔雀明王经

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 春雪

    春雪

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 洪恩灵济真君祈谢设醮科

    洪恩灵济真君祈谢设醮科

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • Memoirs of Carwin the Biloquist

    Memoirs of Carwin the Biloquist

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 随手杂录

    随手杂录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
热门推荐
  • 逆天小公主我的魔尊夫君

    逆天小公主我的魔尊夫君

    她本是21世纪的王牌杀手,遭遇背叛穿越成了一个貌美如花的废柴公主。本以为有个皇帝老爹便可无忧无虑,不曾想一场变故成了魔尊的丫鬟,从此刻苦修炼,攻略美男,走向人生巅峰!一天,莫魔尊跪在搓衣板上。一个粉嫩嫩的小娃娃笑道:“娘亲,这个男的虽然长得好看,但也太怂了,我不想要这个爹爹……”莫女附和道:“我也这么觉得。”莫魔尊瞬间慌了……
  • 魂归异世之江山美人

    魂归异世之江山美人

    她是历史系的大一学生,活泼,开朗,搞怪。一朝穿越到异世。一个外表看似温柔,实则残酷冷血的太子;一个众人眼中,眼瞎退残的淡漠王爷;一个洒脱不羁,温柔多情少主;一个文质彬彬的富家少爷。迷离的身世,残酷的斗争,……在这动荡争权的时代中,她将经历什么,又将情定何人……【情节虚构,请勿模仿】
  • 爱之距

    爱之距

    蕊佳暗恋上司东方旭,感情遭拒,心灵蒙上阴影。为了疗伤,接受了徐子酷的追求,开始囫囵情路。笔会邂逅作家肖白,陷入单相思折磨。东方旭经历情海颠覆后认清蕊佳的可爱之处,极力挽回,无奈昔日情已逝。蕊佳遭遇重大变故,徐子酷绝情而去。十年后,蕊佳鼓起勇气登门拜访作家肖白,却发现其夫妻二人感情深厚,一番苦痛挣扎后,毅然选择放弃。蕊佳有过短暂婚姻,拥有漂亮女儿。丈夫被阴界一美貌孤魂星儿迷恋,星儿制造车祸强行把木森拉到自己身边,车祸中星儿的妖术被解,木森醒悟开始追忆与蕊佳的欢乐时光。为了帮助妻子,从星儿学到妖术,同时修炼阴功,以求重返人间。即将成功之际,意外获知蕊佳再婚消息,万念俱灰的他除去妖术,选择沉沉睡去。蕊佳经历一系列失败的情感,终于醒悟到初恋的珍贵,决定独守亡夫木森过完后半生。而她的再婚不过是掩人耳目,安慰自己的家人和朋友。两人婚前签订了无性婚姻协议。
  • 东京九流人物系列

    东京九流人物系列

    东京汴梁,河南是开封在宋元明时代的古称。清明上河图里的市井人情,在八百年的时光里,延续出万千故事和人物传奇。东京九流人物系列攫取了这些传奇中的五个。《横活》鲁耀是东京城里的风流人物,他好交游,急人难,善诙谐,有术智,为人之所不敢为,道人之所不敢道,忤漫不羁,口齿生花,岂曼倩之再现,文长之复生欤!?第无意上进,甘于淡泊,布衣终身,如浑金璞玉,未成大器,惜哉!然快人快事,生死洒脱,亦足不朽矣。
  • 重生野性时代

    重生野性时代

    从2018回到1993,记忆中,那一年的夏天很热。
  • 空腹健康革命

    空腹健康革命

    断食养生是一种历史悠久的自然疗法,距今已有几千年的历史。它起源于宗教,几乎在每一种宗教里,都有断食的说法。佛教创始人释迦牟尼曾经说过:“若五体之内有任何变患之时,先应断食物矣!”基督教的鼻祖耶稣也说过:“为了健康的关系,神会劝你挨饿,饿可以涤清肠胃,可以使人健康却病。”伊斯兰教创始人穆罕默德说:“断食是进入宗教的门户。”我国土生土长的道教也一直提倡通过“服气辟谷”修炼成仙。
  • 史上最慢快穿

    史上最慢快穿

    #新书《恃萌行凶》已开,欢迎新老读者捧场#【沙雕慢穿,女主在位面无cp,三观正】这是一部节奏最慢、最不像快穿的快穿;也是一部很少按套路出牌,颠覆你想象的非传统快穿。你能想象这世上有一所时空穿梭学院吗?你能想象对于那里的学生来说,穿越不过是家常便饭吗?能进时空穿梭学院的,都是天才少年,但有一个人例外,那就是筱白栀。听说她是靠的“走后门”?不,筱白栀会用实际行动告诉你,她靠的是“实力与运气”。
  • 仿佛

    仿佛

    饥饿会让人发疯,也会失去一切激情。确实是这样。乡村漫画家刘德朴以往很能和自己聊,像一个神经病似的,自己和自己对话。这或许与他从事艺术创作的行当分不开。但曾经天马行空的想象力,忽然迟钝起来,也不知道是因为最近心情不好所致,还是饥饿造成的。总之是,原来内心可以分出的几个自己,互相唠叨得昏天黑地,现在都不知道龟缩在哪里去了,只剩下一个原装的老化了的自我,被去娘家已经住了半个月的老婆撂在家里,每天肚子空落落,饭也懒得做,瞟了眼墙上镜子里自己的那张脸,都菜黄菜黄的了。于是苦笑一下,暗自自嘲了一番,就去做饭了。
  • 大学生求生手册

    大学生求生手册

    喜欢陆不言的读者请加QQ群:470467780
  • 凤倾天下:王妃太嚣张

    凤倾天下:王妃太嚣张

    她现代是佣兵之王,嚣张任性,拥有着傲人资质。一次事故让她巧合穿越到同名废材身上,只有惹上强者才可为天辰所护。当她得知一切事情真相,为家族她勇往直前。明争暗夺,她会如何去做?当所有矛头都指向她,她又会如何面对?杀机重重,危机四起,看孟千凝如何上演好戏。(每天更新大家放心阅读,爽文,有吐槽的也可以,希望大家喜欢)