登陆注册
4705400000006

第6章

It is vehemently maintained by some writers of the present day that Elizabeth persecuted neither Papists nor Puritans as such, and that the severe measures which she occasionally adopted were dictated, not by religious intolerance, but by political necessity. Even the excellent account of those times which Mr. Hallam has given has not altogether imposed silence on the authors of this fallacy. The title of the Queen, they say, was annulled by the Pope; her throne was given to another; her subjects were incited to rebellion; her life was menaced; every Catholic was bound in conscience to be a traitor; it was therefore against traitors, not against Catholics, that the penal laws were enacted.

In order that our readers may be fully competent to appreciate the merits of this defence, we will state, as concisely as possible, the substance of some of these laws.

As soon as Elizabeth ascended the throne, and before the least hostility to her government had been shown by the Catholic population, an act passed prohibiting the celebration of the rites of the Romish Church on pain of forfeiture for the first offence, of a year's imprisonment for the second, and of perpetual imprisonment for the third.

A law was next made in 1562, enacting, that all who had ever graduated at the Universities or received holy orders, all lawyers, and all magistrates, should take the oath of supremacy when tendered to them, on pain of forfeiture and imprisonment during the royal pleasure. After the lapse of three mouths, the oath might again be tendered to them; and if it were again refused, the recusant was guilty of high treason. A prospective law, however severe, framed to exclude Catholics from the liberal professions, would have been mercy itself compared with this odious act. It is a retrospective statute; it is a retrospective penal statute; it is a retrospective penal statute against a large class. We will not positively affirm that a law of this description must always, and under all circumstances, be unjustifiable. But the presumption against it is most violent; nor do we remember any crisis either in our own history, or in the history of any other country, which would have rendered such a provision necessary. In the present case, what circumstances called for extraordinary rigour? There might be disaffection among the Catholics. The prohibition of their worship would naturally produce it. But it is from their situation, not from their conduct, from the wrongs which they had suffered, not from those which they had committed, that the existence of discontent among them must be inferred. There were libels, no doubt, and prophecies, and rumours and suspicions, strange grounds for a law inflicting capital penalties, ex post facto, on a large body of men.

Eight years later, the bull of Pius deposing Elizabeth produced a third law. This law, to which alone, as we conceive, the defence now under our consideration can apply, provides that, if any Catholic shall convert a Protestant to the Romish Church, they shall both suffer death as for high treason.

We believe that we might safely content ourselves with stating the fact, and leaving it to the judgment of every plain Englishman. Recent controversies have, however, given so much importance to this subject, that we will offer a few remarks on it.

In the first place, the arguments which are urged in favour of Elizabeth apply with much greater force to the case of her sister Mary. The Catholics did not, at the time of Elizabeth's accession, rise in arms to seat a Pretender on her throne. But before Mary had given, or could give, provocation, the most distinguished Protestants attempted to set aside her rights in favour of the Lady Jane. That attempt, and the subsequent insurrection of Wyatt, furnished at least as good a plea for the burning of Protestants, as the conspiracies against Elizabeth furnish for the hanging and embowelling of Papists.

The fact is that both pleas are worthless alike. If such arguments are to pass current, it will be easy to prove that there was never such a thing as religious persecution since the creation. For there never was a religious persecution in which some odious crime was not, justly or unjustly, said to be obviously deducible from the doctrines of the persecuted party.

We might say, that the Caesars did not persecute the Christians; that they only punished men who were charged, rightly or wrongly, with burning Rome, and with committing the foulest abominations in secret assemblies; and that the refusal to throw frankincense on the altar of Jupiter was not the crime, but only evidence of the crime. We might say, that the massacre of St. Bartholomew was intended to extirpate, not a religious sect, but a political party. For, beyond all doubt, the proceedings of the Huguenots, from the conspiracy of Amboise to the battle of Moncontour, had given much more trouble to the French monarchy than the Catholics have ever given to the English monarchy since the Reformation; and that too with much less excuse.

The true distinction is perfectly obvious. To punish a man because he has committed a crime, or because he is believed, though unjustly, to have committed a crime, is not persecution.

To punish a man, because we infer from the nature of some doctrine which he holds, or from the conduct of other persons who hold the same doctrines with him, that he will commit a crime is persecution, and is, in every case, foolish and wicked.

When Elizabeth put Ballard and Babington to death, she was not persecuting. Nor should we have accused her government of persecution for passing any law, however severe, against overt acts of sedition. But to argue that, because a man is a Catholic, he must think it right to murder a heretical sovereign, and that because he thinks it right, he will attempt to do it, and then, to found on this conclusion a law for punishing him as if he had done it, is plain persecution.

同类推荐
  • 海棠谱

    海棠谱

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 飛跎全傳

    飛跎全傳

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 龙门心法

    龙门心法

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 李文忠公事略

    李文忠公事略

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 梵网经忏悔行法

    梵网经忏悔行法

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
热门推荐
  • 在坚硬的世界里,修得一颗温柔心

    在坚硬的世界里,修得一颗温柔心

    苏心观点:1、人的衰老,并不是从某个年龄开始,而是从你不再相信美好开始。2、很多时候,我们总是行色匆匆,以为快,便能得到想要的东西。揠苗助长而苗死,才知道万物生长需要等待,幸福是等在门外的晨曦,只有熬过那段黑暗的夜色,它才能推门而至。3、每天认真低头拉车,把手头上的事做好,三五年后再看,当初和你一样迷茫的人依旧迷茫,你却早已脱胎换骨,坐在阳光下浅酌低吟,笑看风景。4、总说时光无情,那是因为你在浪费它。时光其实最有情有义,你投入得越多,它回馈得就越多。5、人生没有白走的路,弯路也算数。
  • 捕鱼者说

    捕鱼者说

    《捕鱼者说》收录了《终于能管你一回》、《心境》、《失眠》、《张山的相好》、《后妈》、《女人》、《捕鱼者说》、《福婶的心情》等近百篇微型 小说作品。
  • 玄冰武祖

    玄冰武祖

    推荐一本起点新书《从逃离太阳系开始》,细节描写很到位,主要是讲太阳系毁灭,重新建立地球系的故事,我看了一下,还挺不错。 【火爆玄幻、热血】史上第一仙尊!重磅发布“我嫉恶如仇!”“敌不犯我我不犯人,敌若犯我,必诛之!”欺善怕恶,该打!阴险狡诈,该打!欲图吾命,该杀!顶级杀手,异世重生,霸道手腕,杀伐果断,融天地之炎冰,习万古之武诀,成就玄冰武祖!
  • 龙舒岸边映山红

    龙舒岸边映山红

    檀炳光一见门口亭亭玉立的女子果真是自己那位没有拜堂的妻子,心里突然有点慌乱。留田刚刚解放,红军所面对的事务千头万绪,何况他身兼数职,就是把自己一分为二也忙不过来,见到章玉音,惭愧之情溢于言表。章玉音有些傻眼。她陡然面对一身戎装、腰间挎着两把短枪的丈夫,特别是他帽檐上那颗小小的红色五角星,在阳光照射下显得格外得红。她想不到,这位没与她拜堂成亲的丈夫穿起军装来是那么英俊挺拔、威风凛凛!只是那张浓眉大眼的长长四方国字脸,略显疲惫和憔悴。她顿时感觉脸颊有些发烫,一时无言以对,就将带来的一双剪刀口黑色布鞋塞在对方手里,深情地说:“把脚上那双破鞋脱下试试,看看合不合你的脚,下回我做鞋心里就有数了。”
  • 名门妻约,总裁老公太高冷

    名门妻约,总裁老公太高冷

    秦虞以为自己只是做了一场梦,四个月后,当医生斩钉截铁的告诉她秦小姐你怀孕了的时候,秦虞懵了......再见到宋漠,是在电视上,他成了整个A市无人不知无人不晓的宋家大少,他的绯闻多过当时的娱乐圈。她隔着电视机看着左拥右抱的他,一口唾沫啐在他脸上,这个臭不要脸的男人,吃干抹净后擦屁股走人的负心汉!当她好不容易带着儿子迎来人生中的第二春的时候,他冷漠如同天神出现在她面前,一张支票甩在她的面前,“秦虞,一个亿,带着那个小东西嫁给我,我许你做宋太太!”【文案:我走过很多路,看过很过风景,喜欢过很多人,到最后转身才发现,只有你才是那个对的人。】
  • 列女传

    列女传

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 每日一杯红酒

    每日一杯红酒

    最畅销的中文红酒权威巨著,国家级葡萄酒评酒委员深度解读红酒文化。
  • 宠夫上瘾:呆萌少爷易推倒

    宠夫上瘾:呆萌少爷易推倒

    “乖乖上榻暖好被窝,不然本姑娘就……你!”土匪窝的女贼手拿皮鞭,精光盯着某男正直的脸死不松手。这年头少爷有三好,好颜,好材……好推倒。面对风骚凛凛的女土匪,战家三少爷两眼一翻,毫不客气的往后一倒:“来吧!”女土匪vs战少爷,打是亲,骂是爱,爱的太深用脚踹。n多年后,某女哭诉:“王八蛋,说好什么都听我的……”“夫人,为夫自然什么都听你的!”某男抱着某女上了美人榻:“这不是给你暖被窝了吗?”
  • 多想你也喜欢我

    多想你也喜欢我

    在我漫长的生命里,最好的时光,是遇见你。我走你走过的路,听你听过的歌,不是为了证明我有多爱你,只是为了离你近一些。我也许无法使你摆脱寂寞,但我至少可以陪你一起寂寞。春光这么好,多想你也喜欢我。本书是「ONE · 一个」常驻作者马叛(@天涯蝴蝶浪子)的首部短篇自选集,精选十五篇最赞故事,陪你度过每一个不眠之夜。
  • Misty Gordon and the Mystery of the Ghost Pirates

    Misty Gordon and the Mystery of the Ghost Pirates

    Here is a funny middle-grade mystery from a bright new fiction talent. Things in the New England town of Ashcrumb are getting weird. Or just weirder. Misty Gordon, whose antique-dealing parents drive a van that says "D.E.A.D." on the side (for "Deceased’s Estate and Antique Dealer"), is accustomed to weird. One day, when accompanying her father to the estate of a recently departed clairvoyant, Misty discovers a notebook and a pair of eyeglasses that enable her to see ghosts! And solve mysteries. With the help of her new powers and her best friend, Yoshi, Misty learns that her hometown was settled not by respectable colonists but by pirates! And the ghosts of the pirates are returning to reclaim a dangerous, powerful treasure they lost centuries ago. Who will find it first, Misty or the pirates?