Constancy to Habit --Optimism --Belief in Providence --Political Opinions --His Friendships --Reverence for Genius --Attitude towards his Public --Attitude towards his Work --Habits of Work --His Reading --Conversational Powers --Impulsiveness and Reserve --Nervous Peculiarities --His Benevolence --His Attitude towards Women.
When Mr.Browning wrote to Miss Haworth,in the July of 1861,he had said:
'I shall still grow,I hope;but my root is taken,and remains.'
He was then alluding to a special offshoot of feeling and association,on the permanence of which it is not now necessary to dwell;but it is certain that he continued growing up to a late age,and that the development was only limited by those general roots,those fixed conditions of his being,which had predetermined its form.
This progressive intellectual vitality is amply represented in his works;it also reveals itself in his letters in so far as I have been allowed to publish them.I only refer to it to give emphasis to a contrasted or corresponding characteristic:his aversion to every thought of change.
I have spoken of his constancy to all degrees of friendship and love.
What he loved once he loved always,from the dearest man or woman to whom his allegiance had been given,to the humblest piece of furniture which had served him.It was equally true that what he had done once he was wont,for that very reason,to continue doing.
The devotion to habits of feeling extended to habits of life;and although the lower constancy generally served the purposes of the higher,it also sometimes clashed with them.It conspired with his ready kindness of heart to make him subject to circumstances which at first appealed to him through that kindness,but lay really beyond its scope.This statement,it is true,can only fully apply to the latter part of his life.
His powers of reaction must originally have been stronger,as well as freer from the paralysis of conflicting motive and interest.
The marked shrinking from effort in any untried direction,which was often another name for his stability,could scarcely have coexisted with the fresher and more curious interest in men and things;we know indeed from recorded facts that it was a feeling of later growth;and it visibly increased with the periodical nervous exhaustion of his advancing years.I am convinced,nevertheless,that,when the restiveness of boyhood had passed away,Mr.Browning's strength was always more passive than active;that he habitually made the best of external conditions rather than tried to change them.
He was a 'fighter'only by the brain.And on this point,though on this only,his work is misleading.
The acquiescent tendency arose in some degree from two equally prominent characteristics of Mr.Browning's nature:his optimism,and his belief in direct Providence;and these again represented a condition of mind which was in certain respects a quality,but must in others be recognized as a defect.It disposed him too much to make a virtue of happiness.It tended also to the ignoring or denying of many incidental possibilities,and many standing problems of human suffering.
The first part of this assertion is illustrated by 'The Two Poets of Croisic',in which Mr.Browning declares that,other conditions being equal,the greater poet will have been he who led the happier life,who most completely --and we must take this in the human as well as religious sense --triumphed over suffering.
The second has its proof in the contempt for poetic melancholy which flashes from the supposed utterance of Shakespeare in 'At the Mermaid';its negative justification in the whole range of his work.
Such facts may be hard to reconcile with others already known of Mr.Browning's nature,or already stated concerning it;but it is in the depths of that nature that the solution of this,as of more than one other anomaly,must be sought.It is true that remembered pain dwelt longer with him than remembered pleasure.
It is true that the last great sorrow of his life was long felt and cherished by him as a religion,and that it entered as such into the courage with which he first confronted it.It is no less true that he directly and increasingly cultivated happiness;and that because of certain sufferings which had been connected with them,he would often have refused to live his happiest days again.
It seems still harder to associate defective human sympathy with his kind heart and large dramatic imagination,though that very imagination was an important factor in the case.
It forbade the collective and mathematical estimate of human suffering,which is so much in favour with modern philanthropy,and so untrue a measure for the individual life;and he indirectly condemns it in 'Ferishtah's Fancies'in the parable of 'Bean Stripes'.
But his dominant individuality also barred the recognition of any judgment or impression,any thought or feeling,which did not justify itself from his own point of view.
The barrier would melt under the influence of a sympathetic mood,as it would stiffen in the atmosphere of disagreement.It would yield,as did in his case so many other things,to continued indirect pressure,whether from his love of justice,the strength of his attachments,or his power of imaginative absorption.But he was bound by the conditions of an essentially creative nature.The subjectiveness,if I may for once use that hackneyed word,had passed out of his work only to root itself more strongly in his life.He was self-centred,as the creative nature must inevitably be.He appeared,for this reason,more widely sympathetic in his works than in his life,though even in the former certain grounds of vicarious feeling remained untouched.
The sympathy there displayed was creative and obeyed its own law.
That which was demanded from him by reality was responsive,and implied submission to the law of other minds.
