登陆注册
5231800000039

第39章 SPEECH ON THE POWERS OF JURIES IN PROSECUTIONS FOR

We have in a libel, 1st. The writing. 2nd. The communication, called by the lawyers the publication. 3rd. The application to persons and facts. 4th. The intent and tendency. 5th. The matter--diminution of fame. The law presumptions on all these are in the communication. No intent can, make a defamatory publication good, nothing can make it have a good tendency; truth is not pleadable. Taken juridically, the foundation of these law presumptions is not unjust; taken constitutionally, they are ruinous, and tend to the total suppression of all publication. If juries are confined to the fact, no writing which censures, however justly, or however temperately, the conduct of administration, can be unpunished. Therefore, if the intent and tendency be left to the judge, as legal conclusions growing from the fact, you may depend upon it you can have no public discussion of a public measure, which is a point which even those who are most offended with the licentiousness of the press (and it is very exorbitant, very provoking) will hardly contend for.

So far as to the first opinion, that the doctrine is right and needs no alteration. 2nd. The next is, that it is wrong, but that we are not in a condition to help it. I admit, it is true, that there are cases of a nature so delicate and complicated, that an Act of Parliament on the subject may become a matter of great difficulty.

It sometimes cannot define with exactness, because the subject-matter will not bear an exact definition. It may seem to take away everything which it does not positively establish, and this might be inconvenient; or it may seem vice versa to establish everything which it does not expressly take away. It may be more advisable to leave such matters to the enlightened discretion of a judge, awed by a censorial House of Commons. But then it rests upon those who object to a legislative interposition to prove these inconveniences in the particular case before them. For it would be a most dangerous, as it is a most idle and most groundless, conceit to assume as a general principle, that the rights and liberties of the subject are impaired by the care and attention of the legislature to secure them. If so, very ill would the purchase of Magna Charta have merited the deluge of blood, which was shed in order to have the body of English privileges defined by a positive written law.

This charter, the inestimable monument of English freedom, so long the boast and glory of this nation, would have been at once an instrument of our servitude, and a monument of our folly, if this principle were true. The thirty four confirmations would have been only so many repetitions of their absurdity, so many new links in the chain, and so many invalidations of their right.

You cannot open your statute book without seeing positive provisions relative to every right of the subject. This business of juries is the subject of not fewer than a dozen. To suppose that juries are something innate in the Constitution of Great Britain, that they have jumped, like Minerva, out of the head of Jove in complete armour, is a weak fancy, supported neither by precedent nor by reason. Whatever is most ancient and venerable in our Constitution, royal prerogative, privileges of parliament, rights of elections, authority of courts, juries, must have been modelled according to the occasion. I spare your patience, and I pay a compliment to your understanding, in not attempting to prove that anything so elaborate and artificial as a jury was not the work of chance, but a matter of institution, brought to its present state by the joint efforts of legislative authority and juridical prudence. It need not be ashamed of being (what in many parts of it at least it is) the offspring of an Act of Parliament, unless it is a shame for our laws to be the results of our legislature. Juries, which sensitively shrank from the rude touch of parliamentary remedy, have been the subject of not fewer than, I think, forty-three Acts of Parliament, in which they have been changed with all the authority of a creator over its creature, from Magna Charta to the great alterations which were made in the 29th of George II.

To talk of this matter in any other way is to turn a rational principle into an idle and vulgar superstition, like the antiquary, Dr. Woodward, who trembled to have his shield scoured, for fear it should be discovered to be no better than an old pot-lid. This species of tenderness to a jury puts me in mind of a gentleman of good condition, who had been reduced to great poverty and distress; application was made to some rich fellows in his neighbourhood to give him some assistance; but they begged to be excused for fear of affronting a person of his high birth; and so the poor gentleman was left to starve out of pure respect to the antiquity of his family.

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 小白进化史

    小白进化史

    一觉醒来,物是人非。原以为是穿越,没想到,却是千年之后。玩个网游,从小白进化成女王。然后某一天她突然发现,游戏里的技能现实里竟然可以使用,或者说,两者合二为一了。额头冒出一丝冷汗,她有不详的预感。
  • 霸道王爷温柔爱

    霸道王爷温柔爱

    紫萱,16岁的花季年龄却有着暗淡的生活,继父的轻薄让她坠楼,魂魄却来到了古代。爱上了温玉却被迫分离,身中奇毒的她再次的被霸道的子墨救去,为了替她解毒,强行的娶了她,新婚之夜,不顾她的意愿,强行的要了她,让她成为了他的女人。他不惜牺牲自己的性命,不惜让她恨他,只为了救她!她恨他,轩辕子墨,可是等她明白了一切的真相后,这样一个霸道的男人是该爱还是恨。她的感情被两个男人牵绊着,到底命运会如何呢/温玉————温润如玉,淡然如水,却独独恋上紫萱!“温玉,如果是你娶妻,你会娶一个美若天仙的女子还是一个很平凡很普通的女子”“选自己爱的”温玉回答的简单却很坚定。子墨————这个霸道的男人,苍穹国的王爷,霸道的宣称她的命是他的,所以他不允许她离开,不允许她死!用他霸道的方式无私的付出!“你的生活,你的生活就是你打算自己静静的等待着毒发,然后接受死亡的来临,或者是你想去找你心爱的温玉,我告诉你,你想都别想!”“子墨你别这样好吗,我知道你是为我好可是……”“紫萱你给我听着,即便是死,你也要死在我的怀抱里,我不会让你一个人孤独的离开,而且我不允许你死!”南君————皓月国君,对她一见倾心,却造就了她于温玉的分离!“朕要你做朕的女人!”“做你的女人,你就肯放了温玉和相国,并不再为难他们,是吗!?”“你答应朕,朕自然会放过他们!”~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~续——【爱上武林盟主】她叫梦姗,武功二流,医术三流,从小的时候就知道,她有一位磊哥哥,为了救她生死不明。所以她决定亲自去寻找她的磊哥哥,为了报答磊哥哥,她可以以身相许。心动不如行动,收拾包袱,拿上磊哥哥小时候的画像,留下一封信,前去寻找。出了家门,却不小心步入了江湖,遇到了一位长的酷酷的好看的男人。什么?竟然让她做他的妾,因为他看她很顺眼。就要做他的妾?这是什么逻辑,这样的男人,鄙视,藐视,然后直接无视,管他是什么盟主。原本一丁点的好感也被冲走了。还是偷偷闪人,去找她的磊哥哥,可是谁让她的武功是二流呢,被抓回去不说,还稀里糊涂的被吃干摸净,成了那个什么狗屁盟主的女人。可是有一天这个让她讨厌的男人却要娶别的女人,为什么她的心痛痛的,她问他为什么,他只说,他对她会和以前一样。
  • 冬日里的莲花:双语(泰戈尔经典诗选Ⅲ)

    冬日里的莲花:双语(泰戈尔经典诗选Ⅲ)

    《冬日里的莲花:泰戈尔经典诗选3(双语彩绘典藏版)》是双语诗歌系列中的一本,收录了泰戈尔的《采果集》和《流萤集》。诗句有的情感喷薄欲出,有的语言清新意味隽永,有的将抒情和哲思完美结合,给人以无尽美感和启迪。
  • 婚姻里的迷茫

    婚姻里的迷茫

    安雅欣和陈旭东一对朋友、家人眼里幸福甜蜜的夫妻,却被一条陌生的短信打破了他们快乐的生活。当安雅欣曾经的追求者,再次出现;当陈旭东的秘密情人,浮出水面。各种诱惑来袭,他们同床异梦,貌合神离!面对婚姻里的各种欲望,曾经幸福甜蜜的他们究竟该如何抉择?--情节虚构,请勿模仿
  • 逆天魔尊妃

    逆天魔尊妃

    从来都被冠上不祥之名,身为柳家五小姐,却被废了丹田,世人嘲笑。所谓的家人,更是推她入了无边炼狱,让她受尽业火焚烧!坠入嗜血恶魔的领域,她以为必被吸干鲜血,必死无疑!可却没想到,万人恐惧的魔鬼,竟成了她最后的一道救赎……涅槃重生,她忍受非人煎熬,蚀骨的仇恨,只为了能一朝复仇!可是,她日渐无法忽视的,是魔尊的那颗心……
  • 创业,从一个小目标开始

    创业,从一个小目标开始

    在书中,作者开诚布公,既分享了创业过程中的里程碑事件也袒露了自己的内心独白。最重要的是,你能得到一些只能在实战中才能获得的中肯建议和创业细节。每个人的创业故事都不同,成功也没有公式可循。而这本书将带给你的是一段特别的创业学习范本。你可以汲取到作者创业时所有成功的、失败的经验,以及处理问题的方式。没有创业沃土的丹麦如何成就了一家伟大的上市公司?为什么作者会放弃舒适的生活而甘冒风险去追寻梦想?对于毫无管理经验的公司而言,如何融资、创建团队并处理好和合伙人的关系?…………读读这本书,去创造属于你的创业故事吧!
  • 老铺子

    老铺子

    已失去理智的易俊伟一拳砸在易大钧的身上。咚的一声,满屋的人大惊失色。易大钧可是天锡堂威不可犯的店主,四方闻名的神医啊。众人闹上来就要动手,黑子轩眼疾手快,一个老虎扑食的拳法把易俊伟啪的一声打趴在地上。易俊伟趴在地上又开始哭,我不管,我当不上药铺掌柜,一天必须一碗土。不然,我就一把火烧了这药铺子。易大钧又一阵眩晕,倒在地上……正是1949年的前夕,城门外又一轮日头探着红脑袋伸出头来,金黄金黄的,耀得百年老药铺天锡堂里里外外暖洋洋的。门脑的牌匾刚刚刷新,黑底金字,上面有三个头大的馆阁体楷书,天锡堂。
  • 诗经三百首大师导读

    诗经三百首大师导读

    《诗三百》中有明澈、清新的篇章,也有古奥难解的诗句,因此,华夏国学书院编著的《诗经三百首大师导读》在每一首诗后都附上了拼音和注释,并对诗的内容进行了简洁的解说,以帮助读者扫清阅读的障碍。同时,在后世浩如烟海的研究和评点中,《诗经三百首大师导读》精心遴选了近当代多位大师(包括鲁迅、胡适、朱自清、闻一多、傅斯年、俞平伯、顾颉刚等人)的观点,单独设立了“大师导读”的板块,让读者能够在聆听大师独到、深刻、鲜活想法的同时,逐渐提升对诗歌的品读能力,丰富对诗歌背景、内涵、艺术妙处的理解和体验。
  • 扎纸人

    扎纸人

    一门扎纸人的手艺,竟然让我惹上了脏东西,我发现这个世界上竟然真的有……
  • 五阴譬喻经

    五阴譬喻经

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。