登陆注册
5362500000223

第223章

Let us suppose that by the laws of this State a married woman was incapable of conveying her estate, and that the legislature, considering this as an evil, should enact that she might dispose of her property by deed executed in the presence of a magistrate. In such a case there can be no doubt but the specification would amount to an exclusion of any other mode of conveyance, because the woman having no previous power to alienate her property, the specification determines the particular mode which she is, for that purpose, to avail herself of. But let us further suppose that in a subsequent part of the same act it should be declared that no woman should dispose of any estate of a determinate value without the consent of three of her nearest relations, signified by their signing the deed; could it be inferred from this regulation that a married woman might not procure the approbation of her relations to a deed for conveying property of inferior value? The position is too absurd to merit a refutation, and yet this is precisely the position which those must establish who contend that the trial by juries in civil cases is abolished, because it is expressly provided for in cases of a criminal nature.

From these observations it must appear unquestionably true, that trial by jury is in no case abolished by the proposed Constitution, and it is equally true, that in those controversies between individuals in which the great body of the people are likely to be interested, that institution will remain precisely in the same situation in which it is placed by the State constitutions, and will be in no degree altered or influenced by the adoption of the plan under consideration. The foundation of this assertion is, that the national judiciary will have no cognizance of them, and of course they will remain determinable as heretofore by the State courts only, and in the manner which the State constitutions and laws prescribe. All land causes, except where claims under the grants of different States come into question, and all other controversies between the citizens of the same State, unless where they depend upon positive violations of the articles of union, by acts of the State legislatures, will belong exclusively to the jurisdiction of the State tribunals. Add to this, that admiralty causes, and almost all those which are of equity jurisdiction, are determinable under our own government without the intervention of a jury, and the inference from the whole will be, that this institution, as it exists with us at present, cannot possibly be affected to any great extent by the proposed alteration in our system of government.

The friends and adversaries of the plan of the convention, if they agree in nothing else, concur at least in the value they set upon the trial by jury; or if there is any difference between them it consists in this: the former regard it as a valuable safeguard to liberty; the latter represent it as the very palladium of free government. For my own part, the more the operation of the institution has fallen under my observation, the more reason I have discovered for holding it in high estimation; and it would be altogether superfluous to examine to what extent it deserves to be esteemed useful or essential in a representative republic, or how much more merit it may be entitled to, as a defense against the oppressions of an hereditary monarch, than as a barrier to the tyranny of popular magistrates in a popular government.

Discussions of this kind would be more curious than beneficial, as all are satisfied of the utility of the institution, and of its friendly aspect to liberty. But I must acknowledge that I cannot readily discern the inseparable connection between the existence of liberty, and the trial by jury in civil cases. Arbitrary impeachments, arbitrary methods of prosecuting pretended offenses, and arbitrary punishments upon arbitrary convictions, have ever appeared to me to be the great engines of judicial despotism; and these have all relation to criminal proceedings. The trial by jury in criminal cases, aided by the habeas corpus act, seems therefore to be alone concerned in the question. And both of these are provided for, in the most ample manner, in the plan of the convention.

It has been observed, that trial by jury is a safeguard against an oppressive exercise of the power of taxation. This observation deserves to be canvassed.

It is evident that it can have no influence upon the legislature, in regard to the amount of taxes to be laid, to the objects upon which they are to be imposed, or to the rule by which they are to be apportioned.

If it can have any influence, therefore, it must be upon the mode of collection, and the conduct of the officers intrusted with the execution of the revenue laws.

As to the mode of collection in this State, under our own Constitution, the trial by jury is in most cases out of use. The taxes are usually levied by the more summary proceeding of distress and sale, as in cases of rent. And it is acknowledged on all hands, that this is essential to the efficacy of the revenue laws. The dilatory course of a trial at law to recover the taxes imposed on individuals, would neither suit the exigencies of the public nor promote the convenience of the citizens. It would often occasion an accumulation of costs, more burdensome than the original sum of the tax to be levied.

And as to the conduct of the officers of the revenue, the provision in favor of trial by jury in criminal cases, will afford the security aimed at. Wilful abuses of a public authority, to the oppression of the subject, and every species of official extortion, are offenses against the government, for which the persons who commit them may be indicted and punished according to the circumstances of the case.

同类推荐
  • 佛说大乘菩萨藏正法经

    佛说大乘菩萨藏正法经

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 脉学阐微

    脉学阐微

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • South Sea Tales

    South Sea Tales

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 梨园原

    梨园原

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 咏张諲山水

    咏张諲山水

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
热门推荐
  • 龙首山

    龙首山

    这个人很硬,当时一声令下,让他的人动手,八九个执法人员一拥而上。对方只有两个,年轻的那个把手中卷尺一丢,从地上抓起一把锄头企图抵挡,只一瞬间就被城管人员抓住,夺下锄头推到一边。中年事主也被从墙边推开,驱到一旁。而后执法人员七手八脚拆除违章建筑,匆促抢建于巷道中的所谓“新大楼”其实就是一堵薄砖墙,很不结实,比纸糊的好不到哪里去,不过十几分钟就被执法人员推倒摧毁。离开之前,中队长下令收缴作案工具,这是常规动作,有如整治市场时收缴违章流动摊贩的扁担箩筐。违章搭盖现场这里有什么作案工具?一把锄头,还有一把瓦刀。执法人员把锄头扔到他们的三轮摩托上,然后收缴瓦刀。瓦刀丢在地上一堆破砖边,泥水匠事主坐在破砖上抽烟,一声不吭。
  • 品牌的力量

    品牌的力量

    品牌的力量,是企业核心竞争力的最重要体现。纵观太重60年的发展历程,每一次的重大的品牌建设和产品创新,都会带来企业的大发展。
  • 双女穿越之百变太子妃

    双女穿越之百变太子妃

    两个现代女生穿越到古代同时得到幸福的故事。她来自现代,叫凌小悦。她戏谑你说,你张俊脸,老娘还舍不得将你卖去鸭窑子呢?怎么办?”她无辜你、、、、你这个恶魔,你可是当今的太子,要有宽阔过人的胸腔。怎么能害一个清白的弱女子呢?她吃醋呵呵,我都说了宇儿,他就是不听呢她说谎我是没有资格,但我这里有资格了吧。她做作帅哥,奴家不会怪你。你那么漂亮,奴家怎么会怪你呢?想死奴家的心了。她休夫本人凌小悦要即日起休了不守男道、冷言冷语、沉默寡言、深不可测、、、的某男她身份百变,是冒牌的璃宫宫主,是苏府佳人,是当朝太子妃,是女儿香的头牌花魁,是贤国的郡主。周旋在各色各样的身份里,她到底能将翰国最冷漠的太子打动吗?集爆笑、轻松、虐情、狗血众多剧情于一身,敬请收看双女系列之百变太子妃,小糖的文文~~~
  • 偷闲斋闲笔

    偷闲斋闲笔

    赵健老师是四川出版界备受推崇的一位导师和前辈。赵老策划、编辑了一批有影响的优秀图书,撰写了上千篇杂文、书评和学术论文。20世纪80年代,赵老以强烈的使命感和责任感,身体力行,严格把关,把一些“信口雌黄”以及伪科学的作品挡在出版的大门外。他引导科普作家端正创作态度,让科普创作规范有序,并亲自策划、编辑了一批高质量的科普作品,受到出版界和读者的欢迎。
  • 华严经吞海集

    华严经吞海集

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 大勇菩萨分别业报略经

    大勇菩萨分别业报略经

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 鬼医嫡妃

    鬼医嫡妃

    尚书府的四小姐以“命硬”二字扬名,镇南王府的世子爷以“短命”二字扬名,太后乱点鸳鸯谱,名为天赐良缘,一道圣旨将命硬的四小姐跟短命的世子爷捆绑在一道儿,从此之后,镇南王府乱了,京城乱了,天下也乱了。【情节虚构,请勿模仿】
  • 新续红楼

    新续红楼

    给黛玉一个幸福的未来,给宝钗一个满意的婚姻。给红楼女儿们一个好的结局。向大家推荐自己的新作《情牵红楼》推荐自己的新作:《红楼梦断之大漠潇湘》向大家推荐自己的新作品《问君惜妾否》《红楼梦中梦之瑕不掩玉》推荐自己的新作《红楼别梦》《红楼遗梦潇湘情》欢迎大家来看哟!欢迎大家的收藏、票票哟36840339欢迎大家到这里说红楼聊红楼!
  • 理惑论

    理惑论

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 王的药妃之前帝公主

    王的药妃之前帝公主

    “主。”四把发自不同嗓音的人单膝跪在眼前冷冰冰无情冷漠的黑衣女子面前,黑衣女子面带泛红的面具,露出一双冷漠到极点没有丝毫情绪外泄的童眸。“起来吧。”冷漠不含一丝感情的嗓音令人往往忽视了那嗓音的美,黑衣女子冷傲的站在湖泊岸边,直视那一朵在暗夜中发出白色的光晕的夏日水莲。今晚正是夏日水莲出世的日子,轩英山庄的人显得格外戒备,只因闻名江湖的雷三小姐今晚会来盗取夏日水莲,怎能叫他们……