In 1793he offers to Dundas to employ himself in drafting Statutes,and remarks incidentally that he could legislate for Hindostan,should legislation be wanted there,as easily as for his own parish.(67)In 1794,Dumont is begging him to 'conquer his repugnance'to bestowing a few hints upon his interpreter.(68)In 1796,Bentham writes long letters suggesting that he should be sent to France with Wilberforce,in order to re-establish friendly relations.(69)In 1798he is corresponding at great length with Patrick Colquhoun upon plans for improving the Metropolitan police.(70)In 1801he says(71)that for two years and a half 'he has thought of scarce anything else'than a plan for interest-bearing notes,which he carefully elaborated and discussed with Nicholas Vansittart and Dr Beeke.In September 1800,however,he had found time to occupy himself with a proposed frigidarium or ice-house for the preservation of fish,fruits,and vegetables;and invited Dr Roget,a nephew of Romilly,to come to his house and carry out the necessary experiments.(72)In January 1802he writes to Dumont(73)proposing to send him a trifling specimen of the Panopticon,a set of hollow fire-irons invented by his brother,which may attract the attention of Buonaparte and Talleyrand.He proceeds to expound the merits of Samuel's invention for making wheels by machinery.Dumont replies,that fire-irons are 'superfluities'--(fire-arms might have been more to Buonaparte's taste)and that the Panopticon itself was coldly received.
This Panopticon was to be Bentham's masterpiece.It occupied his chief attention from his return to England until the peace of Amiens.His brother had returned from Russia in 1791.Their father died 28th March 1792,dividing his property equally between his sons.Jeremy's share consisted of the estate at Queen's Square Place,Westminster,and of landed property producing ￡500or ￡600a year.The father,spite of the distance between them,had treated his son with substantial kindness,and had learned to take a pride in achievements very unlike those which he had at first desired.(74)Bentham's position,however,was improved by the father's death.The Westminster estate included the house in which he lived for the rest of his life.There was a garden in which he took great delight,though London smoke gradually destroyed the plants:and in the garden was the small house where Milton had once lived.(75)Here,with the co-operation of his brother and his increased income,he had all the means necessary for launching his grand scheme.
The Panopticon,as defined by its inventor to Brissot,was a 'mill for grinding rogues honest,and idle men industrious.'(76)It was suggested by a plan designed by his brother in Russia for a large house to be occupied by workmen,and to be so arranged that they could be under constant inspection.
Bentham was working on the old lines of philanthropic reform.He had long been interested in the schemes of prison reform,to which Howard's labours had given the impetus.Blackstone,with the help of William Eden,afterwards Lord Auckland,had prepared the 'Hard Labour Bill,'which Bentham had carefully criticised in 1778.The measure was passed in 1779,and provided for the management of convicts,who were becoming troublesome,as transportation to America had ceased to be possible.Howard,whose relation to Bentham I have already noticed,was appointed as one of the commissioners to carry out the provisions of the Act.The commissioners disagreed;Howard resigned;and though at last an architect (William Blackburn)was appointed who possessed Howard's confidence,and who constructed various prisons in the country,the scheme was allowed to drop.Bentham now hoped to solve the problem with his Panopticon.He printed an account of it in 1791.He wrote to his old antagonist,George III,describing it,together with another invention of Samuel's for enabling armies to cross rivers,which might be more to his Majesty's taste.(77)In March 1792he made a proposal to the government offering to undertake the charge of a thousand convicts upon the Panopticon system.(78)After delays suspicious in the eyes of Bentham,but hardly surprising at such a period,an act of parliament was obtained in 1794to adopt his schemes.Bentham had already been making preparations.He says(79)(14th September 1794)that he has already spent ￡6000,and is spending at the rate of ￡2000a year,while his income was under ￡600a year.
He obtained,however,￡2000from the government.He had made models and architectural plans,in which he was helped by Reveley,already known to him at Constantinople.This sum,it appears,was required in order to keep together the men whom he employed.The nature of their employment is remarkable.(80)Samuel,a man of singular mechanical skill,which was of great use to the navy during the war,had devised machinery for work in wood and metal.Bentham had joined his brother,and they were looking out for a steam-engine.It had now occurred to them to employ convicts instead of steam,and thus to combine philanthropy with business.Difficulties of the usual kind arose as to the procurement of a suitable site.The site secured under the provisions of the 'Hard Labour Bill'was for some reason rejected;and Bentham was almost in despair.It was not until 1799that he at last acquired for ￡12,000an estate at Millbank,which seemed to be suitable.
Meanwhile Bentham had found another application for his principle.The growth of pauperism was alarming statesmen.Whitbread proposed in February 1796to fix a minimum rate of wages.The wisest thing that government could do,he said,was to 'offer a liberal premium for the encouragement of large families.'
